A person’s article on full-frame sensors rekindled inside me a lengthy held desire to see this kind of technology implemented to revive old, manual SLR s and also rangefinder cameras, changing the dependency on film but with no bloat of an ‘expert system’ plus an entire digesting laboratory included in the firmware. Are you able to tell us whether any enterprising producer is working on generating basic digital backs for that fully mechanical 35mm cameras within their back catalog?

With this type of plethora of high-quality 35mm cameras in addition to lenses available online for a pittance, I’d expect that a really range of products would find a all set market among photography pupils and also aging purists like myself, as well as the ‘Full Manual Control’ freaks.

WE SAY Leica developed a digital back but it wasn’t a great success. I don’t believe the economics stack up. You will find so many old cameras of various sizes they couldn’t do a ‘one size fits a IГ item, so any backs produced could have a tiny market and cost a fortune. This is disregarding the image issues of a self-assembly when sensors are usually manufactured and aligned to tolerances of microns. A stripped down, manual just DSLR may find an industry if priced right, but I suspect how the bells and whistles on most DSLRs include little to the overall cost, so there would not be much of a saving.

Related posts:

  1. The Difference: Digital and Film Cameras
  2. Advantages of Digital Cameras over Film in Nature Photography
  3. The Wide World of Digital Cameras
  4. How Digital Cameras See and Think
  5. The way Digital Cameras See and Think